Roger Clemens… and Liturgy

by Michael Kelley on May 07, 2007

This week, the New York Yankees announced in grand fashion that Roger Clemens, the 45-year-old fireballer from Texas was moving back to the Bronx. Starting in June, he will once again don the pen stripes for the Yanks. The kicker—Steinbrenner is going to pay Clemens a pro-rated contract for the 4 months left of the baseball season. The end result is a payday that will amount to almost a million dollars… a week. A WEEK! Not bad work if you can get it, right?

I love baseball, and I really like Roger Clemens. I certainly can’t fault him for his decision to go back to New York (even though I take great pleasure in the misfortune of the Yankees) from the Houston Astros. A million a week is a lot of money. So I don’t blame him for his decision. This move does, however, make me a little nostalgic because it reminds me of what I love about baseball.

I love the history. I love the pageantry. I love the tradition. There’s something to be said for a sport that has been around as long as baseball has. Think about it in terms of the great speech of James Earl Jones from Field of Dreams: “America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers; been written, erased and re-written, but baseball, Ray, baseball has defined us.” Clemens move is another reminder that baseball is changing and that things important in history no longer matter so much.

Ballplayers don’t play for a club any more; they play for a paycheck and get traded quicker than Kevin Costner will make a sports movie. It’s only old school guys that remain completely loyal and still have a glint in their eye. People are more interested in big homeruns than bunting a runner from first to second and then hit and running him home. That’s yesterday’s stuff. I however want to make the argument that history is not bad because it’s old, and I want to make it in terms of something else I care deeply about—worship in the church.

Liturgy, hymns, chants, creeds—these are all old things. And like most old things, they are considered outdated and obsolete. But I think there’s got to be something good in there if for no other reason than the fact that for the last 1500 years the liturgy has remained the same. I can walk into any liturgical church in the world and immediately know what is going on. Why? Because the liturgy.

Some would argue that it, like ball players who stay with their contracts and know how to do a suicide squeeze, is outdated. Maybe it is, but that doesn’t mean we have to get rid of it entirely. Can’t a church include elements of liturgy, Reformation hymns, and 20th century worship music in the same time space? Can’t a team have a guy who jacks 50 homers and one who sacrifices himself to move a guy to second in the same lineup? I don’t think it has to be an either/or thing. But to include both we have to give up some flash. We have to take the road less convenient. We have to concentrate a little more on the finer points. But maybe as baseball fans (or are we talking now about liturgy fans) can rise up together gain and say, “Give us our peanuts and cracker jacks! Give us a sac fly and a runner tagging from third! Give us the passing of the peace and How Great is our God!”

Give us substance as well as hype.

About the Author

Michael lives in Nashville, Tennessee, with his wife, Jana, and kids, Joshua, Andi, and Christian. He grew up in Texas and earned a Master of Divinity at Beeson Divinity School in Birmingham, Alabama. He has written The Tough Sayings of Jesus Volumes I & II, travels throughout the year speaking to students and young adults, and blogs daily at michaelkelleyministries.com.

There have been 3 replies so far

Well said. Church is a lot about entertainment today. Hymns can say in one line, what modern worship songs cannot say in their entirety. There is something about tradition that is good. I’ve just graduated from school to become a history teacher, so I might be biased, but if something sticks with us for centuries, it is obviously worth while at examing and figuring out why. Even more so if it has to do with us and God.

1 | adroge

Wednesday, May 9, 2007, at 2:57am

“Give us substance as well as hype”

This is good stuff. Now if we can just help people to realize that liturgy (whether modern or traditional) exists simply to facilitate real and honest experiences with God. Giving people the opportunity to encounter God and teaching them to bring a “sacrifice of praise” is so important. Just remember, new followers of Christ who have never grown up in the church find Chris Tomlin’s songs just as “unfamiliar” as a Charles Wesley Hymn.

2 | philsantillan

Thursday, May 10, 2007, at 9:45am

I agree with everything in the article - till the last line. I beleive many mondern praise choruses are just hype, BUT I believe that many many of the new choruses are filled with theology and substance. I don’t necassarily believe that a hymn can say in on line what a modern worship song can say in its entirety - i think that is an over generalization.

I love liturgy!! We just did a Good Friday Service that was an amazing time to encounter God and it was based on the liturgy (with minor tweaking). I also love hymns, so many of them are rich with words that bring our hearts into alignment with God. I also believe there are as many hymns that are just fluff. I think the ones we remember are the ones with substance (and that’s good), just like I think the choruses we will remember are the ones with substance.

Let’s also remember that many of the hymns we sing are no more than 200 years old or less. Some people (not saying that is the case of the above comments) believe more in the hymnal than the Bible - God’s word is what will endure and it should be used to bring us into His presence. That’s why i love the liturgy because it is full of scripture each and every week. I think we should be careful elevating hymns - or at the least we should examine them thouroughly, because many are filled with fluff and some with bad theology. I think we should do the same with choruses and make sure we are singing theologically sound songs that glorify Him and not us!!

3 | bradreedy

Friday, May 11, 2007, at 10:18am

Comments are closed. Please use our contact form if you have any thoughts or questions.

Articles